Research

Are we missing at-risk babies? Comparison of customised growth charts v. standard population charts in a diabetic population

Sumaiya Adam, Hennie A D Lombaard, Danie G van Zyl

Abstract


Background. Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with both accelerated fetal growth and intrauterine growth restriction.

Objective. To compare the difference in occurrence of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses in a pregnant diabetic population using population-based growth charts and customised growth charts.

Methods. Retrospective observational study at Steve Biko Academic and Kalafong hospitals, Pretoria, South Africa. Information from an electronic database was used to retrospectively generate customised centiles using a web-based tool (www.gestation.net). The first fetal growth scan of the third trimester, as determined by ultrasound, was plotted for each patient on both the population-based and customised growth charts. We compared the growth category on the population-based growth chart with the that on the customised growth chart.

Results. Of the patients, 44 had type 1 diabetes, 66 type 2 diabetes and 173 gestational diabetes. The growth of 79/283 fetuses would have been reclassified had customised growth charts been used. Of cases in which fetal growth was classified as appropriate for gestation on the population-based growth charts, 58 fetuses would have been LGA and 14 SGA had customised growth charts been used. Four of the fetuses that were SGA and three that were LGA on the population-based growth charts would have been classified as appropriately grown on the customised growth charts. This was a statistically significant difference (p<0.001), with a Cohen’s kappa of 0.45 indicating moderate agreement.

Conclusions. Customised growth charts identified more babies with aberrations of growth, who may need vigilant antenatal care and elective delivery and may be at increased health risk in the future.

Authors' affiliations

Sumaiya Adam, Maternal and Fetal Medicine Unit, Steve Biko Academic Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Hennie A D Lombaard, Maternal and Fetal Medicine Unit, Steve Biko Academic Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Danie G van Zyl, Department of Internal Medicine, Kalafong Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Full Text

PDF (373KB) HTML

Keywords

Gestational diabetes; Large for gestational age; Macrosomia; Growth charts

Cite this article

South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2014;20(3):88-90. DOI:10.7196/sajog.869

Article History

Date submitted: 2014-04-15
Date published: 2014-10-23

Article Views

Abstract views: 3795
Full text views: 4372

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here


The South African Medical Association is the official publisher of the SAJOG.

                                                           

                                        SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

                                                         Events | Careers | CPD

 

The South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology| Online ISSN: 2305-8862 | Print ISSN: 0038-2329 | 

Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) | 

This journal is protected by a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) | Read our privacy policy.

SAMA Journals: South African Medical Journal African Journal of Health Professions Education South African Journal of Bioethics and Law South African Journal of Child Health | Southern African Journal of Critical Care  | South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | Undergraduate Research in Health African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine  | Southern African Journal of Public Health