Original articles

Abdominal blockage of iliohypogastric and ilio-inguinal nerves for management of post-caesarean pain: A novel method

Abdullah Boztosun, Cevdet Duger, Mehmet Ilkay Kosar, Ismail Salk, Sinan Gursoy, Ipitsam Ipek Muderris, Ali Yanik

Abstract


Objective. The aim of this study was to compare pain relief after caesarean section achieved by an intra-abdominal iliohypogastric and ilio-inguinal (IHII) nerve block with levobupivacaine with that in patients given a placebo.
Study design. A total of 60 healthy women scheduled for caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomised to an abdominal IHII nerve block with levobupivacaine (levobupivacaine group) or administration of saline (placebo group). Instead of the classic percutaneous method, the block was administered intra-operatively from the peritoneal aspect. Scores on a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours, adverse effects, morphine consumption and success of blockage by a pinprick test were recorded.
Results. In the levobupivacaine group, the pinprick test showed there to be successful bilateral block in 22 patients and unilateral block in 5, while the block failed in 3. No block was recorded in the placebo group. When morphine consumption at 12 and 24 hours were compared, consumption was found to be significantly low for both time points in the levobupivacaine group. VAS scores 2, 6 and 12 hours after the operation were also significantly lower in the levobupivacaine group.
Conclusion. A block of the IHII nerves from inside the abdomen just before abdominal closure appears to be an effective and safe way of relieving pain after caesarean section.

Authors' affiliations

Abdullah Boztosun,

Cevdet Duger, Cumhuriyet University

Mehmet Ilkay Kosar,

Ismail Salk,

Sinan Gursoy,

Ipitsam Ipek Muderris,

Ali Yanik,

Full Text

PDF (204KB) HTML

Keywords

pain; cesarean; iliohypogastric nerve; ilioinguinal nerve

Cite this article

South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2012;18(1):23-27.

Article History

Date submitted: 2011-08-02
Date published: 2012-01-19

Article Views

Abstract views: 2339
Full text views: 4722

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here