Research

Provision of postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: A quality improvement intervention with pre- and postintervention evaluation.

E E Wynne, G J Hofmeyr

Abstract


Background. Unintended pregnancies remain an important health challenge in South Africa (SA) and worldwide. Improving access to
contraception and long-acting reversible contraception in particular, may reduce the number of unintended pregnancies.
Objective. To determine the impact of a training and supportive mentoring programme on postpartum uptake of long-acting reversible
contraceptive (LARC) methods.
Methods. A quality-of-care improvement intervention with pre- and post-intervention evaluation of LARC uptake was conducted
at a midwife-led, on-site obstetric unit in the Eastern Cape, SA. Midwives were trained in contraceptive counselling and postpartum
etonorgestrel implant insertion. The researcher provided counselling and postpartum intrauterine device (IUD) insertion services.
Results. In the 10 weeks prior to the intervention, neither the IUD nor the implant were provided in the unit. In the 10 weeks after the
intervention, uptake of the IUD was n=27/289 (9.3%) and the implant n=21/289 (7.3%). Use of no contraception or condoms increased
from n=22/273 (8.1%) to n=41/289 (14.2%) (p<0.02). The increase was accounted for by a change in staff in the last 4 weeks of the
intervention period (n=33/105 (31.4%) v. n=8/184 (4.4%) during the first 6 weeks; p<0.00).
Conclusion. Competing responsibilities of maternity staff may limit the contraceptive options offered to postpartum women. A
programme of training and supportive supervision resulted in a substantial increase in levels of LARC uptake. Strategies are needed to
institutionalise comprehensive postpartum contraceptive provision nationally.


Authors' affiliations

E E Wynne, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Walter Sisulu University; Eastern Cape Department of Health, South Africa

G J Hofmeyr, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Walter Sisulu University; Eastern Cape Department of Health, South Africa; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana

Full Text

PDF (121KB)

Cite this article

South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2022;28(1):26. DOI:10.7196/sajog.1649

Article History

Date submitted: 2022-06-22
Date published: 2022-06-22

Article Views

Abstract views: 276486
Full text views: 1645

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here


The South African Medical Association is the official publisher of the SAJOG.

                                                           

                                        SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

                                                         Events | Careers | CPD

 

The South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology| Online ISSN: 2305-8862 | Print ISSN: 0038-2329 | 

Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) | 

This journal is protected by a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) | Read our privacy policy.

SAMA Journals: South African Medical Journal African Journal of Health Professions Education South African Journal of Bioethics and Law South African Journal of Child Health | Southern African Journal of Critical Care  | South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | Undergraduate Research in Health African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine  | Southern African Journal of Public Health