Research

Maternal experiences of care following a stillbirth at Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa

A S Jimoh, J E Wolvaardt, S Adams

Abstract


Background. Despite improvements in obstetrics and neonatal care, the stillbirth rate remains high (23 per 1 000 births) in South Africa
(SA). The occurrence of a stillbirth is a dramatic and often life-changing event for the family involved. The potential consequences include
adverse effects on the health of the mother, strain on the relationship of the parents, and strain on the relationship between the parents and
their other children. The standard of care in SA follows the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Green-top guidelines.
Objectives. To explore maternal experiences of in-patient care received in cases of stillbirth.
Methods. A descriptive phenomenological approach was performed in the obstetrics unit at Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, SA.
Post-discharge interviews were conducted with women who experienced a stillbirth. The healthcare workers in the obstetric unit were also
interviewed on the care provided to these patients. Data analysis was performed using the Colaizzi’s method.
Results. Data from the interviews with the 30 patients resulted in five themes relating to the maternal experience of stillbirth: ‘broken
heart', ‘helping hand’, ‘searching brain’, ‘soul of service’ and ‘fractured system’. Healthcare worker participants emphasised the importance of
medical care (the clinical guidelines) rather than maternal care (the psychosocial guidelines).
Conclusion. While the medical aspects of the guidelines are adhered to, the psychosocial aspects are not. Consequently, the guidelines
require adaptation, especially taking into consideration African cultural practices, and the inclusion of allocated responsibility regarding the
application of the psychosocial guidelines, as this is the humanitarian umbilical cord between healthcare workers and those in their care.


Authors' affiliations

A S Jimoh, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa

J E Wolvaardt, School of Health Systems and Public Health, University of Pretoria, South Africa

S Adams, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Full Text

PDF (147KB)

Cite this article

South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2022;28(1):16. DOI:10.7196/sajog.1648

Article History

Date submitted: 2022-06-22
Date published: 2022-06-22

Article Views

Abstract views: 1242
Full text views: 1386

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here


The South African Medical Association is the official publisher of the SAJOG.

                                                           

                                        SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

                                                         Events | Careers | CPD

 

The South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology| Online ISSN: 2305-8862 | Print ISSN: 0038-2329 | 

Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) | 

This journal is protected by a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial Works License (CC BY-NC 4.0) | Read our privacy policy.

SAMA Journals: South African Medical Journal African Journal of Health Professions Education South African Journal of Bioethics and Law South African Journal of Child Health | Southern African Journal of Critical Care  | South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | Undergraduate Research in Health African Journal of Thoracic and Critical Care Medicine  | Southern African Journal of Public Health