Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: Experience at a tertiary urogynaecology clinic
Background. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common reason for gynaecological consultation, especially in the elderly. Associated
symptoms have been shown to negatively affect bladder, bowel and sexual function, as well as general quality of life. Treatment options
include either surgical repair with mesh or native tissue, or conservative management with vaginal pessaries. There is a lack of data
regarding POP in South African (SA) women.
Objectives. To determine the demographic characteristics in patients presenting with symptomatic POP to a tertiary urogynaecology
clinic, and to compare patients who opt for surgical treatment with those who request vaginal pessary insertion.
Methods. The study was conducted at the urogynaecology clinic at Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, SA. Demographic
information was recorded after a detailed history, physical examination and completion of a self-administered symptom questionnaire.
Results. A total of 305 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 62 (range 24 - 96) years and the mean vaginal parity
was 3.7 (range 0 - 13); 147 patients opted for surgical intervention and 158 for pessary treatment. Cystocoele was the most common
type of prolapse found on clinical examination. One-quarter of patients were sexually active (25.5%, n=242). Awareness and visualisation
or feeling of a lump was the most common symptom reported. Age (p=0.004) and mean vaginal parity (p=0.003) were statistically
significant in the pessary group. Finding of a cystocoele was significantly greater in patients who opted for pessary insertion (p=0.005).
Conclusion. Patients who opt for vaginal pessary insertion are older and more vaginally parous than patients who opt for surgical
intervention, and cystocoele was statistically more significant in women opting for pessary insertion.
Zeelha Abdool, Urogynaecology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Paul Swart, Urogynaecology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Full TextPDF (107KB)
Cite this article
Date published: 2016-09-08
Full text views: 656